Wet vs Electric underfloor heating? Which is best? Wet (water-fed) and electric underfloor heating systems are two popular options for homeowners looking to warm up their floors. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs and circumstances of the individual.
Wet underfloor heating, also known as hydronic heating, uses a network of pipes to circulate warm water throughout the floor. This type of system is typically installed during new builds or major renovations.
Electric underfloor heating, on the other hand, uses a network of cables or mats that are installed directly beneath the floor covering. This type of system is typically installed in small rooms, existing buildings or rooms that do not have access to a water supply.
| Pros | Cons | |
|---|---|---|
|
Water-fed UFH |
Cost-Effective: Water-fed underfloor heating systems are typically more cost-effective to run than electric systems. This is because water can hold and transfer heat more efficiently than electric cables or mats, meaning less energy is required to achieve the same level of warmth. Better for Large Spaces: Water-fed systems are better suited to larger spaces, as they are capable of heating a larger area more effectively than electric systems. More Comfortable Heat: Water-fed systems provide a more consistent and comfortable heat, as they can be easily controlled to maintain a specific temperature. Can use a variety of fuel sources: Water-fed systems can be fuelled by gas, oil, biomass or heat pumps making them potentially more environmentally friendly. |
Higher Installation Costs: The installation costs for water-fed underfloor heating systems are typically higher than electric systems, as they require more extensive work to install the piping system. Longer Installation Time: Water-fed systems require more time to install due to the complexity of the system. Maintenance: Accessing pipes for leak repairs can be difficult and costly. |
|
Electric UFH |
Lower Installation Costs: Electric underfloor heating systems are typically less expensive to install than water-fed systems, as they require less extensive installation work. Quicker Installation Time: Electric systems can be installed relatively quickly, as they do not require the same level of complexity as water-fed systems. More Control Over Temperature: Electric systems can be easily controlled to maintain a specific temperature, and the heat output can be adjusted quickly to suit changing requirements. Easier to install on upper floors: Electric systems are better suited to retro fitting on upper floors as they don’t require reconstruction of the floor. |
Higher Running Costs: Electric systems are generally more expensive to run than water-fed systems, as they require more energy to achieve the same level of warmth. Limited Heating Area: Electric systems are better suited to smaller areas, as they are less effective at heating larger spaces. Less Comfortable Heat: Electric systems can produce a less consistent and comfortable heat than water-fed systems, as they rely on cables or mats to distribute heat, which can create hot spots and cold spots. |
Conclusion
When it comes to wet vs electric underfloor heating, both have their pros and cons, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs and circumstances of the individual. Water-fed systems are more cost-effective to run, provide a more comfortable heat, and are better suited to larger spaces, but require higher installation costs and maintenance. Electric systems, on the other hand, are less expensive and quicker to install, but are more expensive to run and produce a less consistent and comfortable heat.
Zebra Property has installed both water-fed and electric underfloor heating systems on numerous projects and can advise on the suitable system for your circumstance. Two of our recent projects at Broomwood Road and Cipher House included both water-fed and electric underfloor heatingW.
